Doctor Langstrom
I want to be FEARED!
Yes just like speaking around him more often will teach him his first language much faster
Wrong, I just covered that in my above post.
Yes just like speaking around him more often will teach him his first language much faster
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH no it isnt google my friend website after website will tell you the same XD just because you said something you THINK was right doesnt make it true i Trust in experimentation statistics and number's not some guy online with his idea he just thought of out of spiteWrong, I just covered that in my above post.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH no it isnt google my friend website after website will tell you the same XD just because you said something you THINK was right doesnt make it true i Trust in experimentation statistics and number's not some guy online with his idea he just thought of out of spite
just because someone experiences sex doesnt make their sexual organs grow faster it takes time for the body to pick up on the sexual cues of their partners, and getting raped would more than likely stump your sexual maturation because of the damage it causes. Also it would cause the rape victim to stray away from sexual manners further reinforcing the pointNewsflash, those statistics can be wrong. Science can be wrong, scientists can be wrong. You are lumping the whole of humanity into one convenient statistic. As I've said, everyone develops differently. By you're amazing logic, a child getting raped could in fact cause their bodies to hit puberty. After all, they experienced sex!
And all the evidence your are using against my points is Implicated so I guess your points invalidates our whole discussion. Now we're both wrong because of your statement, we aren't scientists we don't have the true meanings. Were both implicating things so if you use that point we are both rather all three of us entirely wrong."The phenomenon is called precocious puberty. Some doctors think it is happening with greater frequency since the 1990s, especially among girls. Many factors have been implicated: hormones in food, hormone-mimicking pollutants in the waterways, and even social issues, such as sex in the mass media and single motherhood."
That's from the site you just linked. It's apparent that you're unaware of the difference between "implicated" and "scientifically proven". At one point in history, it was implicated that the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around us.
"More than likely"....not a phrase you want to use if trying to prove a scientific point. I do completely agree that someone that is raped is more likely to shy away from sexual activity, but her body won't slow down the start of her menstrual cycle.just because someone experiences sex doesnt make their sexual organs grow faster it takes time for the body to pick up on the sexual cues of their partners, and getting raped would more than likely stump your sexual maturation because of the damage it causes. Also it would cause the rape victim to stray away from sexual manners further reinforcing the point
Ilrita
As for your post, the concept of a girl getting pregnant without going through ovulation is what I don't buy. Ovulation is part of the menstrual cycle and the egg going from the ovary to the uterus is how pregnancy can happen. End of.
just because someone experiences sex doesnt make their sexual organs grow faster it takes time for the body to pick up on the sexual cues of their partners, and getting raped would more than likely stump your sexual maturation because of the damage it causes. Also it would cause the rape victim to stray away from sexual manners further reinforcing the point
I agree entirely with you post, I'm not proving a scientific point I'm proving an Ethical point and all my statements, just like yours are written based upon personal observance and literal relations"More than likely"....not a phrase you want to use if trying to prove a scientific point. I do completely agree that someone that is raped is more likely to shy away from sexual activity, but her body won't slow down the start of her menstrual cycle.
not witnessing the act but rather seeing the essence of sexuality and the subconscious cues of sexuality such as eye contact, movement, and speechSo a child who experiences sexual intercourse would not develop faster, but a child who witnesses it would?
I actually have a degree in Biology-Ecology, so YOU may not be a scientist.And all the evidence your are using against my points is Implicated so I guess your points invalidates our whole discussion. Now we're both wrong because of your statement, we aren't scientists we don't have the true meanings. Were both implicating things so if you use that point we are both rather all three of us entirely wrong.
Funny, you were pretty quick to use it as evidence.....Also I was not using that site as the basis of my argument in the first place i googled it about 10 minutes ago, and it states something rather than what i was stating, how could you possibly use that as evidence?
funny but again witnessing a sexual act does not make children sexualWell fluff, maybe if I STOP watching porn I'll go through menopause early.